Keep investing in Maine, expert urges at summit
Speaker at GrowSmart gives state high marks for innovative strides

AUGUSTA, Maine — The global economy may be in crisis.

The stock market might appear to be in a free fall.

And the Maine state government is facing budget shortfalls that will force lawmakers to make tough decisions about what programs to cut.

But this is exactly the wrong time to skimp on investing in a progressive vision of Maine’s future, argued an expert from a Washington, D.C., think tank Friday at the 2008 GrowSmart Maine Summit at the Augusta Civic Center.

“The current crisis has not repealed the fundamentals,” Bruce Katz of the Brookings Institution said. “Innovation matters. Quality of place matters. ... This is not just a frame for good times. This is a frame for bad times.”

Katz was a lead author of the Brookings Institution’s provocative 2006 report on sustainable prosperity for the state, called “Charting Maine’s Future.” The report argued that Maine should protect its “brand” — its quality of place — above all else.

Other recommendations included streamlining state government and investing in job-creating research and development.

Katz came back to assess how the state is doing with implementing some of the report’s sweeping calls for reform.

The verdict? So far, so good, but it’s just the beginning.

“There has been enormous progress in this state,” Katz said. “What you’re struck by is how much has been done.”

Some highlights of that progress include:

• The school consolidation plan that would reduce the number of school districts from 286 to 80.

• The Legislature’s passage of statewide building and energy codes and a historic schools preservation bill.

• Approval of a $17 million bond for land conservation and a $55 million bond for research and development.

However, there’s still much work to be done, according to the policy expert. Even though Maine’s “quality of place” is one of the state’s major selling points, it has a very high rate of sprawl that’s second only to the rate in Virginia.

Between 1980 and 2000, 869,000 acres of rural land were converted to suburban use, he said.

“Sprawl is alive and well in this state,” Katz said. “The state’s not focused on redeveloping its core. ... You’re the last place that should be sprawling, because you have a brand.”

In tough times, Mainers will have to fight to hang on to that brand, said Alan Caron of GrowSmart Maine, the nonprofit that sponsored the summit and paid for the 2006 report.

“My apprehension is that with what’s happening with the marketplace, we’ll go into an entirely defensive mode,” Caron said. “We’ll work only on balancing the budget and not working towards the future. And we can’t really afford to stop thinking about the future.”

The Waterville native said that Maine is facing an unprecedented set of challenges.

“Look at what we’re facing — the global market is weakening, the budget deficit is growing, energy prices are exploding and our communities are in sure peril,” Caron said. “But every crisis contains an opportunity, an opportunity for Maine to grow a green economy.”

Toward that end, the summit featured sessions with optimistic names such as “Can Maine become the green energy state?” and “Innovating our way out of fiscal crisis.” The 500 attendees gave their suggestions for the state’s future and hardly groused at all about its difficult economic present.

Nate Wildes, an 18-year-old political science major and “innovation” minor from the University of Maine, went to the green energy session and came out inspired.

“I have the fire in my gut right now,” he said. “In 10 years, I hope the state will be independent of all outside energy and economically stable enough to support itself. Right now, we just need to start. We need to pull our boots out of the ground and just start running.”

acurtis@bangordailynews.net

990-8133

Not registered? Click here
Email this
Print this
Comments
7 comments on this item

As soon as I hear the term "progressive" I run the other direction!

I see we are quoting crack addicts….

“Keep investing in Maine”

“Maine gets high marks for innovative strides”

The $55 million Baldacci Pork-Bond for research and development~ was a good thing,,,, Why?

.

Our core is in paper, lobster, boats and a handful of other industries these touchie-feelie green pansies have destroyed~ At the risk of sounding redundant, we need diversified manufacturing, and not the same old lame liberal tax-it, and fund it moronic socialist cures!

.

Invest in Maine? Are you sure he was speaking as a representative of a DC think tank and not a drink tank? The only thing the Baldacci administration is saving money on is haircuts, as his wife probably polishes his head with bowling ball wax.

This Katz is considered an expert? X is the unknown quantity ans spert is a DRIP under presure!

Just Imagine if you can... The Maine Maritime Academy which gets $8,000,000 in state subsidies per year from taxpayers is on an aggressive program to recruit out-of-state students. The student body of 800 is now comprised of about half of out-of-staters. The fantasy is that these imported students will settle in Maine. NOT !!! The reality is that they take their heave subsidized education back to whence they came leaving the Maine taxpayer holding the proverbial bag. Meanwhile, Maine youth are finding tuition increases and cutbacks. This insanity has to stop.

Coolfusion is right. The Maine Maritime Academy should be shut down and the properties sold to developers. While it may at one time been a valuable tool and good school to go to, the graduates all leave the state as soon as possible. They wonder why they should pay taxes to a state that they don't earn their income in? We no longer have a merchant marine and if John McCain gets in office even the tugboats in our harbors will be manned by foreign crews. The same goes with the University of Maine System. Why are we educating these kids just to have them leave and we don't get anything for it?

"But this is exactly the wrong time to skimp on investing in a progressive vison of Maine's future . . . "

"Other recommendations included . . . investing in job creating research and development."

I wish these think tank experts would speak plainly and stop using left wing euphemisms, like "investing" when they mean "spending". What they want to do is spend, spend, and spend our tax dollars on their crackpot ideas.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in.
 
Contact Us | Help/FAQ | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Copyright ©2008 Bangor Publishing Co.

Powered by: Creative Circle Advertising Solutions, Inc.